| serialkeygen_me by br0ken |
2222222 |
2026-01-31 14:28 |
| Project Obscura |
Best encryption is worthless with a plain text 'strcmp' ;-) |
2026-01-30 00:57 |
| CrackMe with password |
Ehmm. Password in plain text...
Your encryption function looks interesting, but is useless because of that. |
2026-01-29 01:28 |
| Santa's Network Admin Portal (S.N.A.P.) |
Easy peasy...
SirWardrake : 1594752698 |
2026-01-27 15:12 |
| without fantasy |
Very nice crackme. Well done
The password is really without fantasy^^
Spoiler:
PW is 20 chars long and begins with "__" and ends with "rr" ;-) |
2025-01-31 01:56 |
| crypted string crackme |
123 test test ;-) |
2024-12-23 00:36 |
| LSDtrip crackme! |
nice and easy
Another pw: $viM |
2024-11-26 00:54 |
| VeryEasyCrackme |
since the password is in plain text, Xor encryption is pointless |
2024-11-05 00:51 |
| Bubo |
Why do people post solutions that are obviously wrong? It would have been easy to check them...
Congratz potichek, your solution is correct ;-) |
2024-07-29 01:02 |
| Easy to crack |
Really, really easy...
Come on, you could do better. |
2024-07-18 00:09 |
| libertyordeaths_keygenme_3 by libertyordeath |
Real nice crackme with some obfuscation and anti-debugging. Had fun making a keygen |
2024-05-30 01:39 |
| libertyordeaths_linux_keygenme_2 by libertyordeath |
Very nice one. Had a lot of fun. Made a little keygen... |
2024-05-26 02:02 |
| libertyordeaths_linux_keygenme_1 by libertyordeath |
Very easy. I don't think the behavior was planned that way.
Probably used "=" instead of "+=" by mistake. |
2024-05-24 01:25 |
| Simple Keygen |
extremely easy |
2024-05-23 01:35 |
| Very Special Number v1 |
Very easy. Just some simple math... |
2024-05-23 01:19 |
| Keygen |
nice challenge. Wrote a little keygen
474-616889418
124-324579122 |
2024-05-22 00:49 |
| flag_eater_crackme KeyGen |
Nice and straightforward crackme. Wrote a little keygen |
2024-05-21 02:04 |
| robot[1]: find key |
Very nice one. I'm glad robot is happy now ;-) |
2024-05-19 00:13 |
| cracknkeygen |
Nice one. Some xor-fun. |
2024-05-17 01:01 |
| hexagon |
Nice crackme. Very easy. |
2024-05-17 00:13 |
| hexagon |
Oh damn, forget it. It's not a duplicate. Somehow my files are messed up |
2024-05-16 23:55 |
| hexagon |
lol, this is a copy of "find a real key" by f0rizen...
Better learn to code, and create your own crackmes |
2024-05-16 23:50 |
| find a real key |
good one |
2024-05-16 01:53 |
| nasm crack |
Super easy. Password in plain text... |
2024-05-16 01:15 |
| guess_the_password |
@alxxx: Nope, wrong password ;-)
Extremely easy crackme.
|
2024-05-16 00:59 |
| My first Crackme (Write a keygen) |
Nice crackme. Wrote a little keygen... |
2024-05-14 01:07 |
| My first Crackme (Write a keygen) |
Nice keygen. Wrote a little keygen... |
2024-05-14 01:06 |
| Level1 |
it would be better to query the filename without the path. Otherwise quiet nice |
2024-05-14 00:18 |
| keyGme |
Really nice. Made a little keygen |
2024-05-13 02:18 |
| Key and keygen |
Nice and easy. Made a little keygen |
2024-05-11 01:35 |
| Personal Safe |
Good job, very nice one.
Valid key (there are many valid keys):
222p22=p222p22=p |
2024-05-10 00:11 |
| Simple but not simple |
Easy. The password is hardcoded, but "xor 5"-encrpyted ;-) |
2024-05-09 22:22 |
| Getting started |
Very basic |
2024-05-08 00:08 |
| lvl2 from noxys |
DLLs can be found in MinGW/bin.
The solution is way too easy. This should be difficulty 1.0 |
2024-05-06 23:18 |
| lvl0 easy crackmes |
Missing DLLs
libstdc++-6.dll & libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll (can be found in MinGW/bin)
Otherwise very, very simple to get the secret key |
2024-05-06 23:11 |
| lvl2 from noxys |
uses unknown versions of the MinGW-libraries. Better link them to the binary |
2024-05-06 23:03 |
| crackme_x64 by pnluck |
Nice and easy.
Uses some anti-debugging techniques.
The password is easy to find (compares user-input with ascii)
PW starts with "M" and ends with "N" ;-) |
2024-04-28 00:31 |
| crackme1 |
Finding out the password is very beginner-friendly |
2024-04-22 14:14 |
| AsTinyAsHard (2.5 kb crackme) |
Very nice crackme. Lots of unnecessary code that helps disguise the password. Well done |
2024-04-22 00:49 |
| zun1 crackme |
Very, very simple. Keygen is not worth it |
2024-04-15 01:16 |
| UltraSec |
license key in plain text in source... I'll better try the VMP version |
2024-04-15 00:05 |
| crack me funny lvl 2 |
Extremely simple. Solved in less than a minute |
2024-04-14 22:35 |
| keygenme1 by rayko |
hm, it won't let me post the c++ code properly |
2024-03-26 01:53 |
| keygenme1 by rayko |
for (int i = 0; i 2) + ((2 * userIN[i]++) 2) + 56); |
2024-03-26 01:51 |
| keygenme1 by rayko |
Really, really easy...
Keygen:
for (int i = 0; i 2) + ((2 * userIN[i]++) 2) + 56); |
2024-03-26 01:50 |
| 02 CrackMe - Expl0it |
Very nice crackme!
Easy to crack & easy to find a valid user-password-combination.
But it was a bit difficult to find the function for the password calculation.
However, now my keygen works...
|
2024-03-22 01:57 |
| KeygenMe(Second)_SWD |
@a764934018@outlook.com: Good job, that solution works well! Did you use Ida / Ghidra for this? |
2024-03-17 01:05 |
| KeygenMe_SWD |
@cnathansmith Thank you for your support. I will dig into this approach. I think, I will stick with C++ for the time being until I am more familiar with the subject matter. |
2024-03-06 20:49 |
| KeygenMe |
Nice one, not too hard |
2024-03-06 20:38 |
| KeygenMe_SWD |
Damn it. I tested with dnSpy, it didn't give me the code. With ILSpy it's an easy task.
After some research I found out, that I could use a packer and obfuscator to hide the code. BUT I also learned, that nearly all of them could be bypassed in seconds.
So, is there a way to obfuscate the C#-code properly? Or is it all snake-oil and it's best to NOT use C# for crackmes? |
2024-03-04 16:08 |
| dailycracking_by_flipflop by flipflop |
Very easy. Nice idea |
2024-02-27 01:57 |
| monkey_keygen_1 by monkey |
Nice and easy |
2024-02-26 02:42 |
| GPTCrackMe |
This is the mother of all Anti-Debugging Code^^
After fixing this problem, the password-scrambling-part is easy to solve. Made a little keygen...
Nice one!! |
2024-02-22 00:48 |