| thx for the source, very smart using labels I didn't think of that when coding my own stuff. I suggest striding away from mass obfuscation as It's not fun to reverse imo; overall nice crackme. |
==> |
| key : 557746729
solution will follow! |
==> |
| too much junk code for me to handle, respect to anyone who can crack this! |
==> |
| I don't think anything is being uploaded... |
==> |
| @Marquire can't wait for a v5, I too uploaded a solution for v4 however It too seems to be taking some time. |
==> |
| @DispatchCode From what I've seen, it's to do with the encryption and hashing that allows for different keys to work |
==> |
| Thank you, just sent a solution btw for others. Hope to see a v5 soon! |
==> |
| Key: P_BIT_HARDER?
Turns out I just missed the first letter |
==> |
| Good upgrade since the last I managed to get XCJUPIBSCDQ, sadly this is wrong, I don't have time to reverse this right now so if someone could write a solution that would be great! |
==> |
| key: STILL_EASY? |
==> |
| key: 172hd83jd9dq |
==> |