Author:
InDuLgEo

Language:
Borland Delphi

Upload:
5:13 PM 07/06/2025

Download

Platform
Windows

Difficulty:
4.0

Quality:
4.0

Arch:
x86-64

Description

─────────────────────────────────────────────── InDuLgEo_V4 — KeyGenMe Challenge [2025] — InDuLgEo / AoRE ☠️🧬 ─────────────────────────────────────────────── 💾 Format: PE32 🧠 Language: Delphi (Win32) 🎯 Objectives: - Reverse the algorithm behind the input key validation - Understand the logic from scratch - Create your own working KeyGen based on your findings 💡 Notes: ⚠️ May trigger false positives on some AV engines (e.g., VirusTotal) due to compression layers. This binary is lightly packed for obfuscation purposes. 🧪 It's a trivial unpacking step — no VM, no tricks, no real protection. Just enough to add some flavor before the real reversing begins. 🔍 If you can't get past this, you’re not ready for what's inside. 🚫 Fully safe and educational. ✅ No fake logic or patch traps — it requires a valid key to succeed. 💀 Difficulty: Hard ☠️ Type: KeyGenMe 🔍 Tip: Don’t patch it. Understand it. Code it. Reverse with honor or not at all. — InDuLgEo / AoRE ☠️🧬

• Comments
• Writeups

You must be logged in to post a comment

Ja4V8s28Ck on 5:58 AM 07/07/2025: @InDuLgEo, Will the program give a feedback if we enter the wrong serial??, When I click the validate function just to see how to it works with a random name and serial, there is no feedback.

InDuLgEo on 6:08 AM 07/07/2025: 🔥 @Ja4V8s28Ck Good question, my friend! Nope — the binary stays completely silent if the serial is wrong. No MessageBox, no beep, not even a flicker. 🫥 💡 That was intentional: the whole idea was to force the reverser to dig deep into the logic. If you see any output… you already won. When the name+serial is valid, though… ☑️ You will get visual feedback — loud and clear. 😉 Keep going, I’m sure you’ll get there. — InDuLgEo / AoRE ☠️🧬 "Reverse with honor or not at all."

Ja4V8s28Ck on 6:10 AM 07/07/2025: Oh, Great!

You must be logged in to submit a writeup